Full Program »
Fostering collaboration in CALL: Benefits and challenges of using virtual language resource centers
This qualitative study presents the main findings of a collaborative CALL design and implementation project carried out with two groups of teacher trainees in a Master’s program at a private university in Latin America. Nine virtual language resource centers (VLRC) for higher, secondary, and elementary education levels (from both private and state-school sectors) were designed and piloted for an academic year with the intention of developing the communicative skills of nine different groups of language learners. This project was conceived with the collaborative nature of online environments (Ragoonaden & Bordeleau, 2000; Beatty & Nunan, 2003) and the design principles of Paquette (2000) in mind, seeking novel opportunities to engage learners in collaborative learning practices mediated through technology (being this a core professional development component for the target graduate program). Data collected included questionnaires, surveys, and protocols used to examine all activity generated in the online resource centers. The data analysis yielded important information regarding the benefits, needs, challenges, and possibilities for improvement regarding the use of VLRCs at different educational levels.Firstly, the data revealed that both the teacher trainees and their language learners conceived VLRCs as support sources that foster the development of learner autonomy through different means and procedures: the use of Web 2.0 technologies, the presence of various scaffolding agents (e.g. peers, instructors, learning objects), and instruction in the effective use of learner strategies. Additionally, the design of the VLRCs facilitated the accomplishment of learning objectives (both at the linguistic and personal level) such that language learners were able to engage in collaborative projects related to their contexts and needs. They were also able to select and adjust the centers’ resources to personalize and gradually develop their language learning experience as they also gained and/or strengthened their digital literacy competences. However, the study also revealed some challenges. For example, some learners reported technology-generated anxiety behaviors, which resulted in more limited usage of the VRLCs and their web 2.0 tools, as well as lack of engagement and achievement in the collaborative activities planned. Some teacher trainees, who also acted as designers, reported a degree of technostress (Rosen & Michelle, 1997) stemming from a lack of expertise in the use and administration of the learning management systems and the design of the learning objects. Finally, possibilities for improvements to the VLRCs, such as inclusion of ICT training tutorials and activities that cater to a broader variety of learning styles and language skills, were also revealed.
This session highlights the value of VLRCs as part of a support strategy in language learning settings, either as outreach mechanisms or as complements to face-to face instruction. It also analyzes the implications derived from the design and implementation of collaborative learning initiatives at the graduate education level and the benefits of certain Web 2.0 tools used in the VLRCs.
Author(s):
Liliana Cuesta Medina
Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures
Universidad de La Sabana
Colombia
Patricia Alvarez Ayure
Department of Foreign Languages and Cultures
Universidad de La Sabana
Colombia